The Required Watching Guide to Iranian Cinema

A complete guide to Iranian cinema - the formal tradition, the major filmmakers, the essential films, and the political context that shaped the tradition and made it significant.

· 8 min read

WHY THE TRADITION IS SIGNIFICANT

Iranian cinema is one of the world's great film traditions and one of the least known in mainstream Western film culture. The Cannes competition has been shaped by Iranian films for thirty years. The Academy Award for Best International Film has gone to Iranian films multiple times. The formal achievements are extraordinary. The lack of mainstream awareness is a distribution and critical infrastructure failure, not a quality failure.

The paradox at the heart of the tradition: the specific constraints of making cinema under the Islamic Republic's censorship system produced formal innovation rather than formal timidity. Filmmakers who couldn't show direct physical contact between unrelated men and women, who couldn't depict certain social realities explicitly, who couldn't make political statements directly - developed oblique, allegorical, formally sophisticated strategies that produced a cinema of remarkable formal intelligence. The censorship was the constraint that generated the ingenuity.

ABBAS KIAROSTAMI - THE FORMAL FOUNDATION

Abbas Kiarostami (1940–2016) is the figure around whom the international reputation of Iranian cinema was built, and the filmmaker whose formal innovations most completely define what the tradition contributed to world cinema.

The Koker trilogy - Where Is the Friend's House? (1987), And Life Goes On (1992), Through the Olive Trees (1994) - is the essential Kiarostami entry. Three films set in a rural village, each one filming the making of the previous one, creating a formal structure about the relationship between fiction and reality, between the film and the world it depicts, that is unlike anything in Western or Asian cinema. Formally demanding on a first encounter and increasingly revealing with each subsequent viewing.

Close-Up (1990): A man who impersonated filmmaker Mohsen Makhmalbaf is tried for fraud while the actual Makhmalbaf appears in the film. Part documentary, part reconstruction, part film about what it means to want to be a filmmaker rather than merely to be one. The most formally radical film in the Kiarostami catalogue and one of the great formal experiments in cinema history.

Taste of Cherry (1997, Palme d'Or): A man drives around Tehran trying to find someone who will bury him after he kills himself. The conversations in the car. The decision made at the last moment. The ending that refuses to deliver what the film has been building toward. Formally about what cinema can and cannot show, as much as about what the man in the car is doing.

JAFAR PANAHI - CINEMA UNDER PROHIBITION

Jafar Panahi (b. 1960) has been under a filmmaking ban in Iran since 2010. He has made six films under the ban, all of which were smuggled out of Iran and screened internationally. This circumstance is not peripheral to the work - it is part of the formal argument.

This Is Not a Film (2011): Shot on an iPhone inside Panahi's apartment while under house arrest, showing what it means to not be able to make a film. The formal argument is the situation - a filmmaker demonstrating filmmaking by not being permitted to make films.

Taxi (2015, Golden Bear at Berlin): Panahi drives a taxi around Tehran with a hidden camera. His passengers are actors, non-actors, people playing themselves, the fictional frame never entirely distinguishing itself from the documentary one. The most accessible entry point to the Panahi catalogue.

3 Faces (2018): A road trip in rural northwestern Iran investigating whether a young woman seen in a video has actually killed herself. The most formally conventional Panahi film and the one most directly about the constraints placed on women in Iranian society.

ASGHAR FARHADI - THE MORAL PUZZLE

Asghar Farhadi (b. 1972) is the most internationally visible contemporary Iranian filmmaker and the one whose formal strategy is most legible to Western audiences: the moral puzzle film, in which every character's perspective is fully comprehensible and the ethical question the film poses is genuinely unresolvable.

A Separation (2011, Academy Award): A couple separating in Tehran, a domestic worker's husband, a case of manslaughter that may or may not be intentional. The formal achievement is making every character completely understandable while making the moral question between them impossible to resolve. The first film to win both the Cannes Silver Bear and the Academy Award. The correct entry point to the Farhadi catalogue.

About Elly (2009): A group of friends on holiday. A woman goes missing. The film becomes about the gap between who people present themselves to be and what they've actually done. Formally tighter than A Separation; emotionally more devastating.

THE BROADER TRADITION

Mohsen Makhmalbaf and his daughter Samira Makhmalbaf. Majid Majidi (Children of Heaven, 1997 - the film that most directly reaches a mainstream Western audience). Bahram Beizai, whose archival and historical films are the most complete engagement with pre-revolutionary Iranian culture available in cinema form.

The Iranian cinema available on MUBI UK is the most complete accessible archive of the tradition in the country. BFI Player carries some titles. For physical media, the BFI and Criterion have both released significant Iranian films. The Required Watching platform will flag new Iranian releases and festival appearances as they become available.

‍

The censorship was the constraint that generated the ingenuity.

About your boy

More from this issue

More in this section

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.